Legal Opinion

Moriarty v. Colvin

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided November 20, 2015No. 15-1165PPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

As an incentive to attorneys to bring Supplemental Security Income (SSI) claims, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA), for more than a decade, has paid directly to qualified attorneys a fee of no more than twenty-five percent of the successful recovery of past-due benefits to clients. See 42 U.S.C. § 1383(d)(2)(B). When the federal government administers state supplementary payments for the state, that amount of state payments is included in “past-due benefits.” See 20 C.F.R. § 416.1503. But when the state chooses to administer its own payments,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Parella v. Retirement Board of the Rhode Island Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Méndez-Núñez v. Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for P.R. (In re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd. for P.R.)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  2. Diaz-Baez v. Alicea-VasalloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  3. Johnson v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
  4. Levine v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2020
  5. Rivera-Schatz v. FOMBCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API