Sorodsky v. Keyser

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MICHAIL SORODOSKY, Petitioner, 19 Civ. 5389 (PAE) (BCM) -v- ORDER WILLIAM F. KEYSER, JR., et al., Respondents. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: The Court has received Petitioner’s counsel’s letter stating that, in light of Petitioner’s discharge from parole supervision in the period since he filed his petition, that petition is now moot. Dkt. 34. “Unlike the ‘in custody’ requirement, mootness is not fixed at the time of filing but must be considered at every stage of the habeas proceeding.” Nowakowski v. New York,

835 F.3d 210, 217

(2…