Ganpat v. Eastern Pacific Shipping PTE. Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA KHOLKAR VISHVESHWAR GANPAT, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff VERSUS NO. 18-13556 EASTERN PACIFIC SHIPPING PTE, LTD., SECTION: “E” (4) Defendant ORDER AND REASONS Previously, the Court deferred ruling on the choice of law arguments made by the parties because they were premature.1 Since then, the discovery process has proceeded and concluded.2 There are five pending motions for summary judgment based on the application of different nations’ laws. 3 Accordingly, the Court must resolve the outstanding choice of law issues. To assist the Court,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Hellenic Lines Ltd. v. RhoditisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 296). State of Arizona v. Ideal Basic Industries, State of Arizona v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, and Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corporation, Real Parties in Interest. State of Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.