Kleinberg v. Ratett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
The action is brought by plaintiffs to recover the down payment made by them on a contract for the purchase of certain real property, upon the ground that the defendant was unable to give a marketable title to the premises in question, free from incumbrances, in that they were incumbered by a stream of water flowing through a conduit or pipe about four feet underground across the property. The answer, after denying that the stream in question was an incumbrance, sets forth a separate defense and counterclaim for specific performance of the contract. The learned Special Term made a decision in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Forster v. . ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Barkley v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Scriver v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Whitbeck v. CookNew York Supreme Court · 1818
- Hymes v. . EsteyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.