Kerin v. Palumbo
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
On and prior to July 2, 1930, Roy Palumbo and Mary Rose Palumbo, his wife, were seized as tenants by the entireties of the Pennsylvania real estate here involved. By virtue of that title, such real estate was, as held in Beihl v. Martin, 236 Pa. 519, 84 A. 953, 954, 42 L. R. A. (N. S.) 555, exempt “from the ordinary' legal process to which all other estates are subject.” So far as the record before us shows, there were no judgment's against the husband, nor did he owe any debts. On that day, July 2, 1930, Palumbo and his wife, for a nominal consideration, joined in a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beihl v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Fleek v. ZillhaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- A. Hupfel's Sons v. GettyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
- Getty v. A. Hupfel's SonsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1923
- United States v. Provident Trust Co. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re BarsottiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Blodgett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Danning v. LedererCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- Wylie v. ZimmerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
- Ravick v. Balber (In Re Balber)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.