Legal Opinion
In re Amazon Prime Video Litigation
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided March 15, 2024No. 2:22-cv-00401Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 AT SEATTLE 8 IN RE: AMAZON PRIME VIDEO Master File No. 2:22-cv-00401-RSM 9 LITIGATION, ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS 10 11 This Document Relates To: All Actions 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”)’s 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Dkt. #67. Plaintiffs Mary Baron, Amanda Caudel, 16 Allison Carranza-Cordero, Cathy Diomartich, Calhea Johnson, Malika McLean, Shaney Scott, 17 and Tony Walton (collectively “Plaintiffs”) oppose the Motion. Dkt.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.