Dunnington v. Ford
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to judgment of corporation court of Lynchburg, rendered August 4th, 1884, in the suit of James A. Ford, plaintiff, against V. G. Dunnington, treasurer of the city of Lynch-burg, ordering, for reasons going to the merits, the Auditor of Public Accounts to issue his proper warrant for the payment to said Ford of the sum of $526.05 as of June 7th, 1884, which was wrongfully collected, upon his delivering to the Auditor for cancellation, the coupons offered in evidence.
Read the full summary
Error to judgment of corporation court of Lynchburg, rendered August 4th, 1884, in the suit of James A. Ford, plaintiff, against V. G. Dunnington, treasurer of the city of Lynch-burg, ordering, for reasons going to the merits, the Auditor of Public Accounts to issue his proper warrant for the payment to said Ford of the sum of $526.05 as of June 7th, 1884, which was wrongfully collected, upon his delivering to the Auditor for cancellation, the coupons offered in evidence. Opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtLacy, J.
*178This case is brought to this court under the act of the General Assembly of March 12th, 1884, giving appeals to this court as of right to the Commonwealth in all cases arising under the acts of January 14th and January 26th, 1882, entitled respectively an act to provide for the more- efficient collection of the revenue, &c.
The amount involved in this controversy is $526.05.
This suit is brought under the provisions of the act of January 26th, 1882, as amended by the act of March 13th, 1884. Acts 1883-’84, page 527.
For reasons commending themselves to the legislative mind, the proceedings…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Kleban v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- DeVoss v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1868
- Halberstam v. CommonwealthFairfax County Circuit Court · 1995
- Jennings v. CommonwealthRichmond County Circuit Court · 1989
- DeVoss v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1868
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.