California Human Development Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
POST-TRIAL OPINION
WILLIAMS, Judge.
Plaintiff, California Human Development Corporation (“CHDC”), claims that the Government breached an agreement to engage in good-faith negotiations in awarding close-out costs associated with a Head Start grant it *284relinquished.1 Plaintiff seeks damages of $400,256.71, representing the costs incurred in connection with its purchase of a modular’ facility and leasehold improvements — costs which exceeded its grant. This matter comes before the Court after a trial on liability and damages.
The disputed close-out costs constitute overruns of the grant amount which…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Horn & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Davinci Aircraft, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- Flint v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Harvey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Maldonado v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.