Legal Opinion

California Human Development Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 5, 2009No. 05-1029CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POST-TRIAL OPINION

WILLIAMS, Judge.

Plaintiff, California Human Development Corporation (“CHDC”), claims that the Government breached an agreement to engage in good-faith negotiations in awarding close-out costs associated with a Head Start grant it *284relinquished.1 Plaintiff seeks damages of $400,256.71, representing the costs incurred in connection with its purchase of a modular’ facility and leasehold improvements — costs which exceeded its grant. This matter comes before the Court after a trial on liability and damages.

The disputed close-out costs constitute overruns of the grant amount which…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  5. Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Horn & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Davinci Aircraft, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  3. Flint v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  4. Harvey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  5. Maldonado v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API