Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Jamison

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 26, 1886PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the district court for Waseca county, where the action was tried before Buckham, J., without -a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage given in 1875 by the defendant Gadient, the owner of the land, to McCutchen, of whose estate the plaintiffs are executors. In 1880 the defendant ■Jamison recovered a judgment, which was docketed in the county in which the land in question is situated, against the mortgagor, Gadient. From the findings of the court, it further appears that in August, 1881, under the law of 1881 relating to forfeited lands, judgment was rendered charging this land with taxes for the year 1875, .and several subsequent years, and the land was sold under such tax judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Middletown Savings Bank v. BacharachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
  2. Banning v. BradfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  3. Allison v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  4. Churchill v. ProctorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brown v. Atlanta National Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  2. Norton v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. St. Johnsbitry & Lake Champlain Railroad v. WillardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888
  4. Pedro Alonzo v. Richard MenholtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  5. Upjohn v. MooreWyoming Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API