Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

C.S. v. Mobile County Department of Human Resources

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 26, 2014No. 2130388Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMoore, Judge

I concur that the expert testimony of Dr. Jack Carney, a licensed psychologist, was admissible and that reasonable reunification efforts were made in this case; however, I do not agree "with all of the statements of the law made in the main opinion to reach those conclusions. Moreover, as to the remaining issues addressed in the main opinion, I respectfully dissent.

At the trial of the third petition to terminate the parental rights of C.S. (“the mother”) to her natural child, A.L.C. (“the child”), the Mobile Juvenile Court (“the juvenile court”) received evidence indicating that, although the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BeasleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. T.V. v. B.S.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. K.W. v. J.G.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. M.D.C. v. K.D.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Department of Human Services v. G. N.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API