Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Hernandez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided April 20, 1983No. 845-82Published
1Concurrence
OPINION CONCURRING IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
CLINTON, Judge.
The petition for discretionary review received from our State Prosecuting Attorney presented three grounds for review; though it was granted without restriction, the opinion of the Court fails to address a threshold issue raised in the court of appeals by the State and now reiterated as its first ground for review, viz:
“(1) The Court of Appeals erred in holding that a minor victim, who, as a matter of law, can neither be prosecuted for nor consent to the sexual offense charged, must be corroborated under Art. 38.07, Vernon’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Hohn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Vickery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982
- Soliz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956