Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hernandez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 20, 1983No. 845-82Published

1Concurrence

OPINION CONCURRING IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

CLINTON, Judge.

The petition for discretionary review received from our State Prosecuting Attorney presented three grounds for review; though it was granted without restriction, the opinion of the Court fails to address a threshold issue raised in the court of appeals by the State and now reiterated as its first ground for review, viz:

“(1) The Court of Appeals erred in holding that a minor victim, who, as a matter of law, can neither be prosecuted for nor consent to the sexual offense charged, must be corroborated under Art. 38.07, Vernon’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  2. Hohn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Vickery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982
  5. Soliz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API