Legal Opinion

Heinz v. Auto Club Ins Ass'n

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1995No. Docket 174298PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, P.J.

Defendant appeals from an order of the circuit court granting judgment in favor of plaintiff on plaintiffs claim for no-fault benefits. We affirm.

William Bannister was injured in an automobile accident, and defendant was the provider of his no-fault insurance benefits. As a result of the injuries suffered in the accident, Bannister was incapacitated, and plaintiff was appointed as his guardian and conservator. Approximately two years after the accident, Bannister died. Plaintiff then became the personal representative of his estate.

At issue in this appeal is whether defendant must pay under…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. AAA MICHIGANMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. In Re GerorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. In Re SHIELDS ESTATEMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. In re CarrollMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. In re CarrollMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API