Legal Opinion

1133 South Hope Owner LLC v. Kyle T. Baskin

District Court, C.D. California

Decided November 8, 2023No. 2:23-cv-09282Unknown

1Opinion

1 JS-6 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 1133 SOUTH HOPE OWNER LLC, CASE NUMBER: 5 6 CV 23-9282-MWF(MAAx) Plaintiff(s), 7 v. 8 KYLE T. BASKIN, ORDER REMANDING CASE TO 9 STATE COURT 10 Defendant(s). 11 12 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 13 County of L o s A n g e l e s for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. 14 “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 15 court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.’”…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Nevada v. Bank of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API