Legal Opinion
C & H CONST. v. Leyman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 19, 1984No. AT-383PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
453 So.2d 1163 (1984)
C & H CONSTRUCTION and Aetna Insurance Company, Employer/Carrier/Appellants,
v.
Michael LEYMAN, Employee/Claimant/Appellee.
No. AT-383.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
July 19, 1984.
Rehearing Denied September 6, 1984.
Mark E. Hungate of Fowler, White, Gillen, Boggs, Villareal & Banker, St. Petersburg, for employer/carrier/appellants.
Thomas Cassidy of Smith, Cassidy, Platt & Harris, Lakeland, for employee/claimant/appellee.
BARFIELD, Judge.
In this workers' compensation case the court is again faced with a challenge to the award of rehabilitation benefits by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hurricane Fence Industries v. BozemanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Walker v. New Fern RestoriumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Bailey v. Hawes Chrysler-PlymouthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Paradise Fruit Co. v. FloydDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bammac, Inc. v. GradyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- New Wales Chemicals, Inc. v. ParksDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Towne v. Bates File Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- City of Miami v. SimpsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Arnstrom v. Excalibur Cable Communication, Ltd.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.