Legal Opinion

Goldblum v. Cadillac Homes, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 1959Published

1Opinion of the Court

In' an action to recover real estate brokerage commissions, the appeal is from an order denying, with leave to renew, appellant’s motion to examine respondent by its president before trial. Appeal dismissed, without costs. The order is not appealable. (Belfi v. International Commercial Corp., 277 App. Div. 787; Kalmanash v. Weinstein, 271 App. Div. 788; Weinrib v. American Binder Co., 270 App. Div. 914.) We have, however, examined the merits, and would affirm the order sought to be appealed from if we had not dismissed the appeal. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weinrib v. American Binder Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API