Dixon v. Dixon
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon consideration of the petition, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the petition is denied and the writ discharged.
It is so ordered.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, J., dissents with Opinion.
2Cited by10 opinions
- Carpenter v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Pensyl v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Rindels v. Prudential Life Insurance Co. of America, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
- Lowry v. LowryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Johnson v. FeeneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.