Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. J. and M. Cartusciello

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1930No. Appeal 26 and 27PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Michael Cartusciello, an alderman in the City of Scranton, and his brother, John Cartusciello, a licensed detective, were charged in one indictment with conspiracy to kidnap, and in another, with common law kidnapping of Albert Ziman; the indictments were tried together, and after a general verdict of guilty, defendants were sentenced on the kidnapping charge. They have appealed.

Motions to quash the indictments were made: (a) as not charging “a violation of the common law or of a penal statute”; (b) that the “indictment is not clear so that the defendant is notified of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Commonwealth v. SchwartzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Commonwealth of Penna. v. DegrangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Commonwealth v. ByersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SmithJefferson County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1949
  2. Commonwealth v. PayneBeaver County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1948
  3. Commonwealth v. RuppAllegheny County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API