Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Porter

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 15, 1908PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Proceeding upon the accounting of an administrator.

1Opinion of the Court

Beckett, S.

The administrator’s claim was set out in the account in itemized form as fully as in the claim presented. All other parties in interest, after due notice, defaulted, and no objections were filed to the account. Upon the hearing before the referee appointed to examine said account and to hear and determine said claim under section 2731, Code Civil Procedure, the administrator offered himself as a witness, giving testimony which was, in my judgment, together with additional proof, amply sufficient to establish his claim; the referee, however, disallowed the major portion of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. . WebsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Campbell v. PragueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Keller v. StuckNew York Surrogate's Court · 1880

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of Van ValkenburghNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  2. In re the Accounting of LookerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API