Legal Opinion

M3 Healthcare Solutions v. Family Practice Associates, P.A.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 28, 2010No. 691, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice:

M3 Healthcare Solutions sought modification, vacation, or correction of an arbitration award, in its answer to Family Practice Associates, P.A.’s complaint to confirm that award. The Vice Chancellor held that M3’s answer did not constitute a statutorily required application to contest an award and, in any case, M3 failed to assert sufficient grounds to alter the award. Although the Vice Chancellor incorrectly decided that M3 improperly applied for modification, vacation or correction, given that Delaware is a liberal pleading jurisdiction, we agree with the remainder of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Levitt v. BouvierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  2. Williams v. GeierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  3. Murphy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. Wilson v. Division of Family ServicesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  5. In Interest of Kelly StevensSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roma Landmark Theaters, LLC v. Cohen Exhibition Company LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2021
  2. Thomas J. Gilmartin and Jill Singer v. Whaley Royce, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API