Legal Opinion
Bjornsdotter v. Suttell & Hammer, P.S.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 1, 2020No. 6:18-cv-02079Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ANNA M. BJORNSDOTTER, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:18-cv-2079-MC Vv. OPINION AND ORDER SUTTELL & HAMMER, P.S., and PATRICK LAYMAN, Defendants. MCSHANE, Judge: Plaintiff Anna M. Bjornsdotter, proceeding on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, alleged that Defendants Suttell & Hammer, P.S., (“Suttell”) and Patrick Layman violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seg. (““FDCPA”). Pl.’s Compl. 4 1, ECF No. 1. Specifically, Plaintiff claimed that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.