Legal Opinion

Young v. Machamer

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided March 30, 1867Published

1Opinion of the Court

Charge oe the Court.

This suit is brought upon a bond in the name of the township auditors, conditioned that Charles Machamer shall properly perform his duty as supervisor of Wiconisco township for the years 1862-63. The bond is intended to be taken under the act of March 16th, 1860, requiring such officers to give security; but is very inartificially drawn, being made payable to the auditors of the township and their successors in office, instead of being drawn in the name of the township itself. It is without date; but there is no difficulty as to the time it is intended to cover. The suit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. M'Caraher v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
  2. Speck v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
  3. Commonwealth v. LaubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  4. Greenfield v. Yeates ex rel. Directors of the PoorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1828

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API