Legal Opinion

In Re R.L.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 30, 1945No. Docket 153/512PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The prerogative of the Chancellor as parens patriae to govern the custody of an infant is invoked by the writ of habeascorpus, the return and the scope of the proofs in the present proceeding. State, Baird v. Baird, 19 N.J. Eq. 481, 486. To render an advisory opinion to the Chancellor in such a controversy, the natural and legal rights of the parent must, of course, be contemplated, but the subject of paramount consideration undoubtedly is the welfare of the child. Richards v. Collins, 45 N.J. Eq. 283; 17 Atl. Rep. 831; In re A.B.M.,132 N.J. Eq. 434; 28 Atl. Rep. 2d 518.

Here, the mother, a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richards v. CollinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
  2. Hesselman v. HaasNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
  3. In Re A. B. M.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
  4. State v. BairdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1868

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Albanese v. RichterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  2. In Re Mrs. MNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  3. Scanlon v. ScanlonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  4. In Re AlsdorfNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  5. In Re Application of JacksonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API