Rodriguez v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE B. YATES, Justice.
A jury convicted appellant Salvador Torres Rodriguez of murder and assessed punishment at 50 years’ imprisonment. Appellant challenges his conviction in four issues, arguing that the trial court erred by failing to conduct a sua sponte informal inquiry into his competency, denying his motion for new trial based on incompetency, denying his request for a competency examination prior to the hearing on his motion for new trial, and denying his motion for new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
BackgRound
On the night of the murder, appellant…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Goodspeed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hobbs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
- John Acosta v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
- Alonzo Columbus Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019
- Angel Garay v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
- Anthony Louis O'Connor v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.