Legal Opinion

George D. Barnard & Co. v. Babbitt

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 23, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Memorandum.—Assumpsit upon a written contract. Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair County; the Hon. Alonzo S. Wilderjian, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

This was a suit brought by appellee against appellant to recover for services, under the following written contract:

“ St. Louis, November 26, 1888.

E. n. Babbitt, Esq., Dear Sir: "We propose to make you an offer of $1,650, for the first year and $1,800 for the second, we to have the privilege of canceling the agreement at the end of the first year, if we are not satisfied with your work. Respectfully,

Geo. D. Barnard & Co.

Accepted. E. H. Babbitt. Geo. D. Barnrd, Pt.”

In addition to the general issue, plea of the statute of frauds was filed, and replication that contract was executed in writing…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meeh v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  2. Transgard v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API