Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Lake Superior & Ishpeming Railroad

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 28, 2004No. Docket 246260PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

I. OVERVIEW

Craig Hughes sued his employer, Lake Superior & Ishpeming Railroad Company (LS&i), under the Federal Employer’s Liability Act (FELA) 1 for damages arising from work-related injuries. LS&I moved for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(7) on the ground that the three-year statutory period of limitations began to run when Hughes discovered his work-related injuries. The trial court denied the motion after finding that LS&I committed a continuing tort by exposing Hughes to working conditions that continued to injure him. Ls&I appeals the order denying summary disposition by leave…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Monessen Southwestern Railway Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jason Reineke v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API