Legal Opinion
Doe v. Bellmore-Merrick Central High School District
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 3, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Zelda Jonas, J.
The petitioners had moved by order to show cause for a court order permitting petitioners to serve and file a notice of claim using pseudonyms to conceal the identity of the infant petitioners who are alleged victims of sex crimes. At this juncture, the actions have not been commenced since pleadings were not filed and served, and issue has not been joined. On the return date of the applications, the parties named in the captions of the notice of claims stipulated that petitioners are permitted to serve and file a notice of claim in the names of “John Doe…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- New York Times Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Roberson v. . Rochester Folding Box Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Doe v. New York UniversityNew York Supreme Court · 2004
- Eusini v. Pioneer Electronics (USA), Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Jane Doe v. John DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020