Legal Opinion
Matter of CF Holding Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 14, 1992No. 19-20168PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR ORDER DETERMINING NONCOMPLIANCE WITH FED.R.BANKR.P. 2019
ROBERT L. KRECHEVSKY, Chief Judge.
I
ISSUE
At issue in this proceeding is the reach of Fed.R.Bankr.P. 2019 1 as it applies to attorneys. The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (movant) has moved the court to determine that two law firms, Hogan & Hartson (H & H), and Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & Kotkin (S & S, R & K) (together “respondents”) who have jointly filed a Rule 2019 Statement (Statement), have failed to comply with all of the rule’s mandatory provisions. The respondents contend no further compliance is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wilson v. Valley Electric Membership Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992
- City of Lafayette v. Oklahoma P.A.C. First Ltd. Partnership (In Re Oklahoma P.A.C. First Ltd. Partnership)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baron & Budd, P.C. v. Unsecured Asbestos CommitteeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- In Re North Bay General Hospital, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Muralo Co. v. All Listed on Exhibits a Through D to Complaint (In Re Muralo Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- In Re Northwest Airlines Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Washington Prime Group Inc. and Official Committee of Unsecured CreditorsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2022