Legal Opinion

Strowbridge v. City of Chiloquin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, C. J.

Plaintiffs confess the incompleteness of their transcript and tender with their opposition to the motion to strike a completed transcript. They also present sufficient justification for not having filed a complete transcript sooner. The case is one in equity and, therefore, the court could not try the case anew without all the evidence, and, of course, would have refused to do so on the record as it stood when the motion to strike was made. But the situation now is different and we do not think plaintiffs should be penalized for their inability to procure a complete transcript: Walker v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Packwood v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API