Legal Opinion
Reinhart v. United States Department of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 10, 2002No. 01-3283PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
William J. Reinhart appeals from an order entered by the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) that imposes civil penalties against him for violating the Horse Protection Act (HPA). After concluding that Reinhart violated the HPA by “soring” his Tennessee Walking Horse in order to enhance the horse’s performance at an exhibition, the Secretary fined Reinhart $2,000 and barred him from participating in any horse exhibition for a period of five years. The Secretary subsequently denied Reinhart’s petition for reconsideration of the decision. Reinhart now appeals,…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ruel E. Brown v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- Yeschick v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Kuhn v. Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Moncier v. JonesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2013
- Boone v. Warden Mansfield Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Cameron v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.