Legal Opinion

Jones v. Wessel

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1894No. 5540Published

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Tibbets, J.

1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.

This was an action for the price of a mare pony purchased by Jones, the plaintiff in error, from the defendant in error Wessel. It was alleged by way of answer that by one of the conditions of the contract Wessel warranted the said pony to be kind and gentle and in all respects safe and reliable, but that she was in fact vicious and balky, and that on the discovery of her true character he, Jones, elected to rescind the said contract and immediately returned her to Wessel. The reply was a general denial. ' We assume the alleged warranty to have been fully established by the evidence, but upon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. WatersNebraska Supreme Court · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API