Legal Opinion

In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Schrinsky

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1987No. 86-1436-DPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Attorney disciplinary proceeding; attorney publicly reprimanded.

The referee recommended that Attorney Alan P. Schrinsky be publicly reprimanded as discipline for his neglect of a client’s legal matter. We accept that recommendation and, in addition to publicly reprimanding Attorney Schrinsky, we require him to pay the costs of this proceeding.

Attorney Schrinsky was admitted to practice law in Wisconsin in 1963 and practices in Milwaukee. He *90has not previously been the subject of a disciplinary proceeding. The referee is the Honorable John A. Fiorenza, reserve judge.

The referee made findings…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against SchrinskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API