Routier v. Williams

On petition for rehearing.

Pee Cueiam.

Counsel for the appellant have filed a petition for rehearing. It is contended that the holding summarized in the third paragraph of the syllabus, to the effect that the contract evidenced by a regular blank indorsement is within the general rule which excludes parol evidence to vary or contradict a written contract, is contrary to the previous decisions of this court in the cases of Dickinson v. Burke, 8 N. D. 118, 77 N. W. 279, and Sawyer State Bank v. Sutherland, 36 N. D. 493, 162 N. W. 696, and it is said that those cases should either be followed or…