United States v. Conoco, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SEAR, Chief Judge.
Background
Plaintiff United States seeks reimbursement from Conoco pursuant to the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA”), 33 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq., of costs incurred by the United States in connection with two oil spills from Conoco’s pipelines into the Gulf of Mexico. The essential facts are not in dispute, having been stipulated to by the parties prior to the government’s filing of this action. Only a brief summary of the facts is necessary for purposes of this Memorandum and Order.
The United States’ claims in this matter relate to two oil spills by Conoco…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dole v. United SteelworkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marathon Pipe Line Co. v. LaROCHE INDUSTRIES INC.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1996
- United States v. J.R. Nelson Vessel, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- United States v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1996