Legal Opinion

United States v. Conoco, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided February 8, 1996No. Civil Action 95-2236PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SEAR, Chief Judge.

Background

Plaintiff United States seeks reimbursement from Conoco pursuant to the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA”), 33 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq., of costs incurred by the United States in connection with two oil spills from Conoco’s pipelines into the Gulf of Mexico. The essential facts are not in dispute, having been stipulated to by the parties prior to the government’s filing of this action. Only a brief summary of the facts is necessary for purposes of this Memorandum and Order.

The United States’ claims in this matter relate to two oil spills by Conoco…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Dole v. United SteelworkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marathon Pipe Line Co. v. LaROCHE INDUSTRIES INC.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1996
  2. United States v. J.R. Nelson Vessel, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
  3. United States v. Murphy Exploration & Production Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API