Legal Opinion

Porter v. Hawaiian Pork Packing Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Exceptions from Circuit Court, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, J.

Plaintiff obtained a verdict for $1050. Defendant moved for a new trial on the ground of misconduct of plaintiff’s attorney in bis argument to the jury. A new trial was granted. The case now comes here on pliantiff’s exceptions to the ruling of the trial judge granting tbe new trial.

The facts as stated by the trial judge in his decision granting a new trial are as follows:

“In his opening address to the jury, Mr. Davis (Plaintiff’s attorney) stated in substance, that this action had been already tried once before another jury; 'that both Judge Carter and Judge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. SwinefordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Rudolph v. LandwerlenIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Evans v. Town of TrentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  4. Cook v. DoudSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  5. Porter v. Hawaiian Pork Packing Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Young v. PriceHawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  2. State v. CavnessHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Young v. PriceHawaii Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API