Legal Opinion

City of Urbana v. Houser

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1977No. 48793PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dooley

In 1976 the city of Urbana, a home rule municipality within the meaning of section 6, article VII, of the Constitution of 1970, filed a complaint for a demolition. It alleged a structure within the municipal limits was so dangerous and unsafe that the condition could not be eliminated by repair and that the building official of the city had declared the structure dangerous within the meaning of section 11 — 31—1 of the Illinois Municipal Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 24, par. 11—31—1).

A motion to dismiss was made. It urged a want of authority by the city to maintain the action, since the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ampersand, Inc. v. FinleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Kanellos v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. City of Carbondale v. Van NattaIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. City of Chicago v. BirnbaumIllinois Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. City of Evanston v. Create, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Triple a Services, Inc. v. RiceIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Landmarks Preservation Council v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. City of Elgin v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People Ex Rel. City of Urbana v. PaleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API