Osterman v. Goldstein
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of the defendants. Action upon a promissory note, against indorsers..
1Per curiam
The defendants are sued as indorsers of a promissory note. After suit was brought but before the time to answer had expired, the defendants caused the amount due with interest and accrued costs to be tendered to the plaintiff, upon condition that the note should be surrendered. The plaintiff refused to accept the tender upon the condition attached. Thereupon the defendants answered stating several defenses, one of which alleged the tender, in behalf of the defendants, upon the condition stated and the refusal of this plaintiff to accept such tender and fulfill the condition attached. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Halpin v. . Phenix Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Tuthill v. . MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Cass v. . HigenbotamNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Bailey v. . County of BuchananNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Wilson v. . DoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stratton v. GrahamNew York Supreme Court · 1913