Ross-Meehan Brake Shoe Foundry Co. v. Southern Malleable Iron Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, District Judge.
The above is a consolidated cause pending in this court. Three separate bills have been filed against the defendant company as an insolvent corporation. Receivers were appointed under the first bill, and the receivership extended to the subsequent bills as filed. The bills, as now consolidated, are for the foreclosure of a mortgage on defendant’s property, and as general creditors’ bills, to wind up the defendant company as an insolvent corporation. The usual steps taken in such cases have been had in this. In the progress of the case, and on December 5,- 1894, the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Thomas v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Porter v. SabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Triplex Shoe Co. v. Rice & Hutchins, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1930
- Meholin v. CarlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- Lee v. CameronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Randall v. MickleSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Hollander v. HeaslipCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.