Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Quinn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 2010PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a matrimonial action, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Willen, J.H.O.), entered May 8, 2009, as awarded the plaintiff an attorney’s fee in the sum of $9,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

An award of an attorney’s fee pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 237 (a) is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court (see DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879, 881 [1987]; Stadok v Stadok, 25 AD3d 547 [2006]; Herzog v Herzog, 18 AD3d 707, 709…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. DeCabrera v. Cabrera-RoseteNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Prichep v. PrichepAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Morrissey v. MorrisseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Baron v. BaronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Popelaski v. PopelaskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Siskind v. SiskindAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Aloi v. SimoniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Patete v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Guzzo v. GuzzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Fredericks v. FredericksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API