Snook v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Motion by defendant for a new trial on the minutes. Miller & Bentley, for plaintiffs.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
The Rome, Watertown and Ogdensbnrg division of defendant’s railroad runs in an easterly and westerly direction through the northern part of Monroe county and, at a station called Walker, plaintiff Snook owns a small tract of land adjoining defendant’s right of way on the south. On this tract of land Mr. Snook had, prior to March, 1913, several buildings which he used in the produce business conducted by him at that station. One of the buildings was called the lime shed, and in it he had stored some fifty odd barrels of lime, which had been shipped to him over defendant’s railroad, and which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hoffman v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- People v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Jacobs v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Hinds v. . BartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Branson v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.