Legal Opinion

Mann v. R. Simpson & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 1939Published

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, P. J.

The plaintiff is a dealer in jewelry and the defendant is a licensed pawnbroker. On November 18, 1937, the plaintiff delivered to one Alfred M. Gouldon a diamond ring for which the latter signed a memorandum reading as follows:

*330“ The undermentioned goods are for your examination at your risk, against Loss, Fire, Burglary or Theft, and remain the property of M. H. Mann and are to be returned to him on demand. None of them are sold, nor does the title thereto pass until we shall be apprised of your selection, and have rendered a bill of a sale therefor.

1 Bound diamond Bing 5.63

For

$2100.-”

Gouldon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Green v. WachsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Nelkin v. Provident Loan SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API