Legal Opinion

Martina Rodriguez v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 3, 1993No. 1143, Docket 92-2764PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Our court has recently received a number of appeals presenting problems that relate to the interval between deportation and the end of an alien’s term of imprisonment. Several district judges have sought to depart downwardly from an alien-defendant’s guidelines sentence to adjust in advance for the anticipated collateral consequences of the alien’s status — including what is often a lengthy stay in Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) deportation centers awaiting deportation. See, e.g., United States v. Restrepo, 802 F.Supp. 781 (E.D.N.Y.1992). We write this opinion to help clarify…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ulric Paul Giddings v. Ronald C. Chandler, District Director InsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. Anthony Chukwuma Emejulu v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. Paulino v. ConneryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  4. Odalia Perez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rodolfo Hernandez-Avalos v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Larry David Walford v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, for the State of Colorado United States District Court District of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. Cruz v. MolerioDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  4. David R. Jolivet v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API