Legal Opinion

Miles v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 9, 1893No. 92Published

ERR'OR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE .UNITED STATES FOR- THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. • ■ This was an action to recover on a policy of life insurance. Trial, verdict for the defendant, and judgment on the verdict; to review which this writ of error was sued out. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court 1

147 U.S. 177 (1893)

MILES

v.

CONNECTICUT MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 92.

Supreme Court of United States.

Submitted December 14, 1892.

Decided January 9, 1893.

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA.

Mr. Richard P. White and Mr. James Aylward Develin for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Hunn Hanson for defendant in error.

2Opinion of the Court · BlatchfordJustice Blatchford

This is an action at law, brought by Sarah G. Miles against the Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company, in the Court of Common Pleas No. 3, for the county of Philadelphia, State of Pennsylvania, and removed by the defendant, a…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Pilcher v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  3. Garner v. . Germania Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Miles v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Schneider v. United States Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API