Legal Opinion
State v. Muller
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 17, 1996No. 94-02958PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, Acting Chief Judge.
The state appeals from an order of the Pasco County Court declaring section 316.193(6)(d), Florida Statutes (1993), the DUI vehicle impoundment law, to be unconstitutionally vague. We affirm.
After the trial court declared the impoundment provision unconstitutional, Raymond Muller pleaded no contest to DUI, and was adjudicated guilty and placed on probation. Section 316.193(6)(d), Florida Statutes (1993), states, in pertinent part:
In addition to the penalty imposed under paragraph (a), paragraph (b), or paragraph (e), the court shall also order the impoundment or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Bouters v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- State v. GinnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. MullerSupreme Court of Florida · 1997