Legal Opinion

Pasternack v. Block

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1962Published

1Opinion of the Court

James S. Bbowu, Jb., J.

This is a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice. Act in the nature of prohibition to restrain respondents from proceeding with the trial of petitioner.

Petitioner was charged with a violation of section 435-5.0 of the New York City Administrative Code (unnecessary noise) and a trial begun before a Magistrate of the City of New York. The complaining witness appeared without counsel and, after inquiry as to an adjournment to obtain counsel, the court marked the case ready and stated the District Attorney would represent the complainant. The record discloses…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Matter of Culver Contrg. Corp. v. HumphreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. People of N.Y. v. . Canal Board of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Reed v. LittletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. People Ex Rel. Hummel v. . Trial TermNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. People v. . CignaraleNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API