Legal Opinion
State v. Shriner
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 2, 2007No. A07-181Published
1Opinion of the Court
739 N.W.2d 432 (2007)
STATE of Minnesota, Appellant,
v.
Janet Sue SHRINER, Respondent.
No. A07-181.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
October 2, 2007.
Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and James C. Backstrom, Dakota County Attorney, Debra E. Schmidt, Assistant County Attorney, Hastings, MN, for appellant.
Jeffrey B. Ring, Jeffrey B. Ring and Associates, Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.
Considered and decided by WILLIS, Presiding Judge; MINGE, Judge; and HUDSON, Judge.
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
The state challenges the pretrial suppression of the results of a warrantless, nonconsensual blood draw,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.