Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marsh v. Utah Homes, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1965No. 10370Published

1DissentCrockett, Justice

I dissent. The difficulty I see with this case is that on the one hand it allows the plaintiff the advantage of liberality in procedure for his actions and on the other, imposes a very strict standard of compliance upon the defendant. Rule 73(h) provides that “An appeal may be taken to the District Court * * * within one month after notice of the entry of such judgment.” It is significant that here there had been no exact fulfillment of the requirement of giving “notice of the entry of such judgment” by the plaintiff. A day before the judgment was entered, plaintiff caused a carbon copy of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morris v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Foley v. FoleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Buckner v. Main Realty and Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Penman v. Eimco CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API