Legal Opinion

Franklin Savings Bank v. 108 East 86th Street Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1942Published

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

1 his is a motion by a receiver in foreclosure for per-

mission to withdraw a motion heretofore made to compel the defendant to turn over to him certain moneys which he contended belonged to the defendant and were properly applicable to the turnover demand. Sharp issues of fact were involved and the matter was sent to a referee to take proof and report to the court with respect thereto.

The referee duly qualified and thereupon set a date for hearing; counsel appeared; no proof was taken but an adjournment was requested and granted. Further adjournments took place by arrangement before the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mead v. . TuckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. In re the Estate of MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API