Legal Opinion

Cieklinski v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 16, 2007No. 05-75079Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Michael Cieklinski and Allan Nairn petition pro se for review of a decision of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) limiting an award of damages to identified traveling workers whose federal statutory rights had been violated by a local union. We dismiss the petition for review.

Petitioners lack standing to challenge the NLRB’s order affirming the award of damages to petitioners, and setting aside the award of damages to unidentified traveling workers. See 29 U.S.C. § 160(f) (any person “aggrieved” by a final order of the NLRB may obtain review in court of appeals);…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Mothershed v. Justices of the Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Southeast Association for Retarded Citizens, Inc., D/B/A Southeast Work Training CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API