Burgess v. Burgess
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Per curiam
The question in this case was decided in 1885, in Kimball v. Kimball, 63 N. H. 598, and the construction then put upon the statute in question ( Laws 1883, c. 14 ) was adopted by the legislature in 1891 by re-enactment without change. P. S., c. 175, s. 3; Parsons v. Durham, 70 N. H. 44, 45. Consent cannot confer jurisdiction where none exists. Whenever it appears that a court has no jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the suit, the proceeding is dismissed even if no objection is made. See Weeks v. Fowler, ante, p. 221.
Exception overruled.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Parsons v. DurhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899
- Kimball v. KimballSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
3Cited by8 opinions
- Daine v. DaineSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- Porter v. PorterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
- Manchester Dairy System, Inc. v. HaywardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
- Kennedy v. TitcombSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
- In Re Bunker EstateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.