Legal Opinion
Associated Business Telephone Systems Corp. v. Danihels
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 20, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-3943PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERRY, Chief Judge.
This is a diversity action between plaintiff, Associated Business Telephone Systems Corporation (“ABTS”), whose principal place of business is in New Jersey, and defendant, Leo J, Danihels, who is domiciled in Nevada. The parties are presently before the court upon motion of defendant to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for lack of personal jurisdiction. In the alternative, defendant seeks transfer of this action to Nevada pursuant to the doctrine of forum non conveniens.
BACKGROUND
ABTS is a telephone systems service corporation…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Latshaw v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Alexander v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Kultur International Films Ltd. v. Covent Garden Pioneer, FSP., Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Independent MacHine Co. v. International Tray Pads & Packaging, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Lauchheimer v. Gulf OilDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.